Comparison Of Freuds `future Of An Illusion` To Carl Jung`s `psychology And Religion`

The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast Carl Jung s theory of godliness and the effect it produces on society and Sigmund Freud s theory of faith and the dash it impacts society . The comparison is make based on Jung s ` mental science and Religion and Freud s `The Future of an IllusionIt is widely known that Sigmund Freud views theology as an illusion , only little analysis has been done of the fibre Freud ascribed to organized religion especially in the wider social contextStarting with the grassroots Freud s air concerning the origins of religion , the psychiatrist believes that gentlemans gentleman beings opinion in perfection stems from childhood fear of the unknown and a vox populi of beingness unprotected and disproofless against the unfamiliar world . When a gentlemans gentleman is faced with a phenomenon that lacks rational explanation , human soulfulness needs to explicate it anyway , and here religion gains groundSince theology is the central simulacrum in the majority of world religions Freud offers other perspective one the relationship mingled with belief and archeozoic childhood experience . God , in this debate , butt joint be seen as another saying of ` let heterogeneous or Oedipal conflict . This complex arises when babe s liking for the receive and the prohibition on such desire , which is represented by the forecast of the arrive , are in conflict . accordingly , religion glorifies the origin of God and mandates despotic submission to this powerAnother psychicalal mechanism that contributes to the equating between father and God in the context of religion is the sense of transgressioniness . This feeling makes public submit to the authority of religion and breathe obedient . As for the spirit of this guilt , Freud takes the explanatio n from anthropology , which speaks of human ! guilt for the complete of the primal father . The memory of this bump off id repressed , yet religion is a reflection of this guilt in a latent formA different side of the equation has to do with longing fulfillment .

The benevolence and omnipotence of God gives humanity the impression that both their wish is susceptible of being translated into behavior Freud argues that this approach is in truth infantile since it prevents humans from differentiating between realistic and unrealistic wishesLove to father is projected on the figure of God , therefore believers much speak of `love when describing their sacred feelings . Freud actually writes about religion as a neurotic symptom , yet this arrogant neurosis is a defense mechanism used for the purposes of culmination to terms with reality . The psychic mechanism involved into the forcing out of the image of father on the image of God is derealization of the figure of real father and renewal of this figure with the belief in more powerful GodSince the power of God is unlimited , religion can even invalidate death and finite nature of human life . some(prenominal) religions are founded on the underlying faith in hereafter , which is the only thing that makes the rough-cut existent of some believers tolerableYet Freud is convinced that religion is not only illusory...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay