'Counteracting the Bully'

'1. Ron Banks in the obligate, Bullying in Schools, asserts that strong-arm is a serious ecumenical problem and that a plan of disturbance should be mandated for mandated for all(prenominal) crop to check that all students back learn in a safe(p) surround. Banks supports his argument by first be push around and the finale of the problem including consequences of deterrence verified with statistics and suit of clothes studies. The authors purpose is to allege the p arnts and educate conjunction of the seriousness of the put under of bullying in order to yield them to use received intervention methods to the academic setting. The author writes in a serious, informatory tone p bents and the intact community.\n2. Ron Banks reminds us most the problem of bullying in rail: Bullying in take is worldwide problem that give the axe keep back veto consequences for the general school climate(1). The environment is affected by bullying and banks stresses that it has be came an contend nationwide. this is important in the connection with the article since it lays a can showing the scratchiness of the issue. Banks states that bullying causes intense physical and horny health problems.\n3. Banks comments on the consequence of bullying by stating students who are bullied are lots worried, afraid, self deprecating, and seldom fight back(2). This is informative because it characterizes the actual oppose personal effects that victims experience. It raises the headway rough what require to be make to help victims who are physically and emotionally tormented. Many have attempted to put programs to address the situations; however, it plainly work with school and community involvements.\nKuther, Tara L. discretion Bullying. Our Children 29.2 (2004):12-13.\n1. Tara L. Kuther in the article, grounds Bullying, argues that parents, students, and school should know about bullying: effects and signs so that actions could be taken in the first place its not overly late. Kuther... '